Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 05:34
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 72
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 858
90% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 113
Parallax 105
89% 109 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 101
81% 98.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron XT 480GB-$210
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 411 437 449 454 454 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 456
Mixed 274
SusWrite 436
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 41.1
147% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 73.2
89% 158 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 116%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
646GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 182 184 184 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 136
Write 91.8
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 183
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
170GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 140 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 132
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 139
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
658GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 73 79 85 74 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 14
Write 1.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 79.2
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
733GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 128 129 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 165
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 129
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
126GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 2.3
Write 29
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 40
29% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.7
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 26.8
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 7,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $740
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback