Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 03:22
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-4170-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
47.1% Average
1-Core 109
2-Core 204
74% 156 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 282
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 281
19% 281 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4578
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 14
Parallax 14.1
3% 12.9 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 7
Splatting 17.7
3% 11.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$79
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 53 57 60 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 40.3
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 56.7
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD080HJ/P 80GB-$25
59GB free
Firmware: ZH100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 49
Write 49.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 59.3
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
USB DISK 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 1e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.5
7% 6.45 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 78.B1GDE.AU10C 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 10,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $460
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $344Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $190
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback