To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	52.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190119
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '19 at 03:18
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 71.8 1-Core 58.3 2-Core 104 49% 78 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 361 34% 282 Pts	64-Core 685 42% 685 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37C2) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.7% Excellent	Lighting 97.8 Reflection 96 Parallax 104 80% 99.2 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 93.7 Splatting 82.6 83% 104 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB 5,933 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0629A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 84 752 66 556 636 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 929 Write 979 Mixed 681 SusWrite 422 169% 753 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 18.4 94% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 368 DQ Mixed 46.6 116% 242 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 264%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 132 133 133 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 82 Write 127 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 131 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 157% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Atermiter B0- 4x16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	91.8% Outstanding	MC Read 41.5 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 37 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 97.3 41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	706x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	614x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	101x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16