Notebook P65_67HSHP

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	480% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Notebook P65_67HSHP (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65_67HSHP
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170223
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '19 at 00:10
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 88.4 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 218 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 595 63% 501 Pts	64-Core 582 36% 582 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Lighting 96 Reflection 115 Parallax 89.7 78% 100 fps	MRender 92.2 Gravity 91.1 Splatting 98 77% 93.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 11,069 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 41 40 41 43 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	480% Outstanding	Read 5,221 Write 51 Mixed 101 SusWrite 40.1 281% 1,353 MB/s	4K Read 664 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 6.4 1,017% 225 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 480% Great: 234%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 770GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 32 34 35 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9.83% Terrible	Read 0.5 Write 33 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 33.5 12% 17 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 9.83% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GB 1,275 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 13 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 13.1 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P65_67HSHP Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

System: Notebook P65_67HSHP

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	191x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	171x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	40x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	23x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	13x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
Blue SATA M.2 250GBWD $89Bench 81%, 7,519 samples	8x

RAM
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	28x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	8x
CM4X8GF2400C16S4 2x8GBCorsairBench 72%, 789 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 152% - Outstanding

Total price: $150

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16