MSI MS-17C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 36% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GP73 Leopard 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-17C5  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181018
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '19 at 20:02
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 64.4
36% 54 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 216
21% 174 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1215) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3630
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 54.7
48% 60.5 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 54
Splatting 66.3
52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 220 216 219 220 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 415
Write 564
Mixed 526
SusWrite 258
100% 441 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 23.5
76% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 275
202% 264 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
317GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 448 452 449 451 443 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 433
Write 398
Mixed 394
SusWrite 446
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 28.1
88% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 237
174% 227 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17C5 Builds (Compare 1,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback