Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '19 at 17:40
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 291
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 784
82% 658 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1115 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.4% Good
Lighting 77.5
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 111
63% 82.2 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 77.2
64% 77.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1248 1378 1364 1324 1339 1333 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,935
Write 1,413
Mixed 805
SusWrite 1,331
306% 1,371 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 58.6
219% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 46.8
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 310
186% 191 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 232%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 294 294 293 294 292 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 433
Mixed 384
SusWrite 308
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 53.2
174% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 232
199% 292 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 203 208 211 196 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 178
Mixed 90
SusWrite 201
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
211% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 120%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3400 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3399 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 32.5
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 33
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $685
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback