Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS  (all builds)
Memory50 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime5 Days
Run DateSep 16 '19 at 14:18
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 199
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 661
57% 487 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396
Zotac(19DA 4500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.85
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 158
Parallax 149
134% 157 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 142
Splatting 97.3
110% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK1T0MBF 1TB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 68 58 70 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 313
Write 58.2
Mixed 199
SusWrite 70.3
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 28.5
106% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 84
85% 144 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
55GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 163 161 153 142 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 309
Mixed 339
SusWrite 166
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 45.6
160% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 355
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
137GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 401 414 417 436 433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 430
Mixed 371
SusWrite 422
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 38.5
137% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 355
266% 353 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 36.2
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $472
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback