PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus H97-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150304 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 16 '19 at 13:11 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.7%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
14.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 62 57 59 55 52 MB/s
|
94.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1TB
388GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 81 79 84 84 MB/s
|
35.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 371x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 253x |
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 243x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 191x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 127x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 120x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $567 |