HP 870-203np

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP 870-203np (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 82F1
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161219
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '19 at 21:49
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 129 2-Core 254 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 706 74% 590 Pts	64-Core 694 43% 694 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.7 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.2% Very good	Lighting 97.8 Reflection 111 Parallax 93 80% 101 fps	MRender 96.3 Gravity 92.1 Splatting 97.4 78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV01H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 143 144 142 142 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 449 Mixed 378 SusWrite 167 83% 373 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 56.2 189% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 351 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 122%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 625GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 105 104 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 155 Write 154 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 104 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 159 157 160 158 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 140 Write 134 Mixed 111 SusWrite 158 185% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 105%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 722GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 40 39 39 39 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 30 Mixed 27 SusWrite 38.6 44% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 22.4 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 25.3 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-203np Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: HP 870-203np

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 99%, 5,580 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16