Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 137%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181019
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 14:48
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9700K-$360
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
99% Outstanding
1-Core 140
2-Core 284
100% 212 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 980
97% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,098
74% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 389
Reflection 363
Parallax 428
102% 393 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 388
Splatting 247
104% 290 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$71
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 326 330 327 326 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,351
Write 1,471
Mixed 1,287
SusWrite 367
303% 1,369 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 81.4
280% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 1393
DQ Mixed 1,011
813% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 256%
Great: 273%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
42GB free
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 106 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 436
Write 251
Mixed 228
SusWrite 87.3
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 19.9
79% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 42.4
48% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 52%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$37
80GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 90 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 479
Write 416
Mixed 349
SusWrite 128
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 31.1
131% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 164
148% 222 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 90%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$22
238GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 78
Write 67.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 81.6
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
842GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 193 193 194 194 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 184
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 191
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
121GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 92 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 114
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 92.3
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 31.4
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 29.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 52.6
76% 52.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 117%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 12,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 136%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,482
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback