Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '19 at 12:59
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 142 2-Core 272 95% 170 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 786 80% 645 Pts	64-Core 788 49% 788 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37CE) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 118 Parallax 111 102% 118 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 103 Splatting 84.7 86% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$82 74,184 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1030 1250 896 677 1420 1676 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	314% Outstanding	Read 2,188 Write 1,006 Mixed 936 SusWrite 1,158 293% 1,322 MB/s	4K Read 69.3 4K Write 190 4K Mixed 96.4 329% 119 MB/s	DQ Read 1,431 DQ Write 1,002 DQ Mixed 577 604% 1,003 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 314% Great: 311%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 232GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 449 405 290 288 289 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 490 Mixed 460 SusWrite 361 103% 456 MB/s	4K Read 49.4 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 65.7 222% 77.8 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 128%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 275GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 72 71 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 92.2 Write 88.5 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 70.7 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 331GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 125 124 123 124 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 176 Write 150 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 123 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 258GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 102 101 103 103 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 65.7 Write 35.5 Mixed 71 SusWrite 99.6 51% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 211% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 95GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 64 65 65 65 65 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 59 Write 53.3 Mixed 40 SusWrite 63.5 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 41%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 345GB free Firmware: 6601 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 102 103 103 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 110 Write 101 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 103 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 25.5 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 26.7 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 58.6 68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	476x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	78x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	90x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $910

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16