Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 08:58
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 146
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 436
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Sapphire(174B E270) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 35
Parallax 47
32% 40.3 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 39.8
29% 34.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01b10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 228 224 225 226 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 294
Write 258
Mixed 249
SusWrite 192
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 25.2
87% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 26.2
35% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
78GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 63 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 53.1
Write 44.6
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 62.1
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 39%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
55GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 81.6
Write 80.5
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 82.5
62% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 85%
Samsung G2 Portable 500GB
117GB free, PID 6033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 23.2
Write 17.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 37.9
36% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback