Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 74.3 1-Core 97 2-Core 193 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 503 48% 396 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% PowerColor(148C 2379) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16% Very poor	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 75.8 0% 46.1 fps	MRender 62.7 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 52.4 47% 58.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89 17,796 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 400GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1207A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 51 77 92 76 85 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.5% Below average	Read 118 Write 23.5 Mixed 230 SusWrite 77 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 22.9 60% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 95.2 DQ Mixed 4.1 36% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	45.3% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 14.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 91.9 44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	127x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	114x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $358

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16