Asus Q302UA

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus Q302UA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q302UA
Memory	8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150827
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '19 at 05:26
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	94%
CPU Throttled	95%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 78.7 1-Core 66.2 2-Core 146 58% 97.1 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 216 30% 219 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1CAD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	1.64% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.92 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.64% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99 7,913 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 262 270 273 277 270 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 353 Write 341 Mixed 274 SusWrite 273 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 15.3 53% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 216 190% 285 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 104%
Spcc Sol id State Disk 256GB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 116GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 199 110 55 64 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 313 Write 298 Mixed 275 SusWrite 115 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 9.9 49% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 40.8 55% 100 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 12GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 13 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 7.1 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q302UA Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Q302UA

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	11x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	11x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
CS1311 120GBPNY $63Bench 75%, 12,393 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 0112 76.A305G.C5G0B 6GBSamsungBench 41%, 78 samples	6x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 6GBSamsungBench 37%, 760 samples	3x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 0012 12GBSamsungBench 33%, 12 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16