Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 167%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 02:25
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,135
103% 865 Pts
64-Core 1,612
100% 1,612 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 229
Parallax 248
184% 234 fps
MRender 253
Gravity 217
Splatting 143
160% 204 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 256 302 297 294 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 477
Mixed 448
SusWrite 294
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 48.1
154% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 286
215% 292 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
250GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 358 457 466 460 464 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 476
Mixed 458
SusWrite 424
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 47
162% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 324
238% 314 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
467GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 357 458 466 461 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 476
Mixed 460
SusWrite 427
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 46.6
157% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 306
229% 309 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
134GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1347 297 297 297 298 298 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,455
Write 1400
Mixed 1,281
SusWrite 472
310% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 66.7
222% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 409
349% 533 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 222%
Great: 280%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
723GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 1453 1479 1443 1430 1466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,450
Write 1,484
Mixed 1,063
SusWrite 1,457
307% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 60
203% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 248
229% 365 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 229%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4A2666C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 27.4
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 29.4
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,009
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback