Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 161 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 343 37% 294 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 7.69 Parallax 8.94 7% 8.34 fps	MRender 8.71 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 10.7 8% 9.88 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3200822AS 250GB 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 92 90 90 100 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 123 Write 120 Mixed 108 SusWrite 95.2 83% 111 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 23 3,874% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 44.4 DQ Mixed 27.8 269% 30.9 MB/s

WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 323GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 26.8 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 27.6 36% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 10 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16