Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	7.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9980HK 8,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 155 2-Core 308 100% 184 Pts	4-Core 583 8-Core 1,065 99% 824 Pts	64-Core 1,487 92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0927) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.03% Terrible	Lighting 6.93 Reflection 12.5 Parallax 8.53 6% 9.31 fps	MRender 9.19 Gravity 7.53 Splatting 16.7 10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.03% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 389GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1815 1079 822 791 775 764 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 890 Write 1,689 Mixed 1,272 SusWrite 1,008 276% 1,214 MB/s	4K Read 60.4 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 81.6 264% 90.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1294 DQ Write 1,096 DQ Mixed 1,127 863% 1,172 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 707GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1658 1387 1629 1372 1329 1348 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 1457 Write 1,680 Mixed 895 SusWrite 1454 309% 1,372 MB/s	4K Read 61.6 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 83.7 273% 94 MB/s	DQ Read 1,403 DQ Write 1,215 DQ Mixed 1301 977% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 410%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 58GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 90.1 Write 73.7 Mixed 37 79% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 61% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KHYXPX-MIE 1x8GB 2,515 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	44.9% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 11.3 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	351x
Quadro RTX 3000NvidiaBench 67%, 3,632 samples	161x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 90%, 1,330 samples	127x

SSD
2200S NVMe 512GBMicronBench 167%, 5,553 samples	51x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc601Bench 162%, 6,475 samples	44x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,839 samples	73x
HMA82GS6DJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 81%, 2,453 samples	62x
AO1P32MCST2-BW4S 2x16GBAdataBench 94%, 157 samples	44x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16