Asus CM1630

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM1630  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM1630
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '19 at 23:07
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GRL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 86.7
42% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 152
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 16
Parallax 17.1
16% 17.4 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 16.8
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 41 44 44 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 197
Write 165
Mixed 158
SusWrite 42.6
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 14.3
58% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 18.5
21% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 69%
Toshiba MK2555GSX H 250GB
11GB free
Firmware: FG001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 39 45 45 45 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 57.7
Write 62
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 44.6
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 42%
Generic- SD/MMC 0GB
0GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3.4
6% 5.37 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM1630 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1630

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $31
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback