Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '19 at 22:04
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 109 2-Core 222 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 681 68% 553 Pts	64-Core 901 56% 901 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PowerColor(148C 2372) CLim: 1315 MHz, MLim: 1790 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.7% Average	Lighting 48.6 Reflection 57 Parallax 53 40% 52.9 fps	MRender 66 Gravity 58.1 Splatting 56.1 49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 153 136 130 134 113 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 496 Write 457 Mixed 274 SusWrite 148 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 38.5 130% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 146 140% 220 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 101%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 22GB free Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,756 Write 3,142 Mixed 4,650 1,000% 4,516 MB/s	4K Read 319 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 158 743% 195 MB/s	DQ Read 935 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 461 381% 565 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 340GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 155 155 155 154 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 150 Write 136 Mixed 94.3 SusWrite 154 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 123GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 65.8 Write 68.5 Mixed 39 SusWrite 59 43% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 46%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 62GB free Firmware: AM0P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 81 81 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 82.8 Write 74.5 Mixed 32 SusWrite 80.2 49% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 60%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30 12,971 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 33GB free Firmware: CC2H SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 69 69 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 71.5 Write 69.2 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 68.1 47% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 39.4 MC Mixed 35.8 112% 39.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 37.1 SC Mixed 29 85% 29.8 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,058

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)