Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 121 2-Core 236 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 670 66% 540 Pts	64-Core 677 42% 677 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 890GB free (System drive) Firmware: LXM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 168 49 12 20 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 97.8 Write 152 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 80.1 74% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB 44,819 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.9% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 13.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,156x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,910x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,090x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	1,057x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	919x

SSD
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	386x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmt128gBench 83%, 5,624 samples	265x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 180%, 5,016 samples	182x

RAM
RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 6,442 samples	582x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	409x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	296x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16