PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H81M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140102 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 14 '19 at 15:29 |
Run Duration | 197 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
71.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 213 164 177 176 175 MB/s
|
61.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
5GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 72 69 82 86 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
75GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 105 88 107 111 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
195GB free
Firmware: 1H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 115 82 116 118 MB/s
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
10GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.6 0.5 1.8 1.6 1.3 MB/s
|
0.89%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 1,181x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 500x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 489x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 565x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 477x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 412x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $287 |