Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X420FA_X420FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X420FA_X420FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X420FA
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190318
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 14 '19 at 09:47
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 29%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 60.2
26% 161 Pts
64-Core 59.9
4% 59.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1901) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 2.06
3% 5.53 fps
MRender 9.76
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 12.3
8% 9.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 160 176 201 199 199 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 348
Write 335
Mixed 203
SusWrite 189
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 26.4
87% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 93.8
DQ Mixed 61.1
90% 177 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 92%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
400GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 32 39 38 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 23.3
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 34.9
36% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 63%
Multiple Card Reader 64GB
19GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 18 19 17 11 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 10.7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 15.7
16% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
82% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.3% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 12.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 20.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X420FA_X420FA Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X420FA_X420FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback