Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3L

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3L (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100623
Uptime	9.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '19 at 06:46
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 130 62% 99 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 371 42% 329 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E164) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 1.38 1% 1.96 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.96 1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 31 32 13 29 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.6% Poor	Read 216 Write 35 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 37.5 18% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 10.8 46% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 12 DQ Write 16.7 DQ Mixed 12.1 10% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 148GB free Firmware: 3.ADA SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 72 73 73 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 72.8 Write 72 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 72.7 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 42%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 340GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 79 40 40 17 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 50.8 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.8 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 10.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-USB3L Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3L

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	11x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	8x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x

SSD
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	2x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	6x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $486

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16