Sony VPCZ136GG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSony VPCZ136GG  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '19 at 05:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 580-$250
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 53.9
2-Core 84.4
43% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 149
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sony(104D 905A) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9024
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 1.06
2% 2.41 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.95 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.1
Write 60.1
Mixed 37.1
34% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.2
552% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 213%
Generic SD Card 16GB
4GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 21.4
Write 16.8
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 16.5
14% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.3
402% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback