Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite M500 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090915
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '19 at 05:39
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7450-$90 2,755 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Memory 37 1-Core 16.4 2-Core 50.7 22% 34.7 Pts	4-Core 45.9 8-Core 40.3 6% 43.1 Pts	64-Core 32.9 2% 32.9 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210M 1,370 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FF40) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 2.42 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.96 2% 1.92 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3263GSX 320GB-$68 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: FG020M SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 25 27 26 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 17.3 Write 25.8 Mixed 14 SusWrite 24.1 15% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 50% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.92% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.5 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1.3 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 217 18% 217 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.92% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16