Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	22 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '19 at 22:28
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 95.8 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 158 70% 114 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 378 40% 321 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 570 Graphics 2,735 User benchmarks, average bench 48% MSI(1462 341E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 62.4 Parallax 72.2 0% 44.9 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 59.7 Splatting 51.6 47% 58 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 29GB free Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 76 56 53 52 52 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 241 Write 72 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 56.8 23% 107 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 9.4 51% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 77 69% 108 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 44%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 475GB free (System drive) Firmware: 07.04C07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 87 87 85 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 97.6 Write 93.4 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 86 63% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 62%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 080. SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 79 79 79 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 116 Write 113 Mixed 52.8 SusWrite 79.5 66% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3120814A 120GB-$133 163 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 41GB free Firmware: 2AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 35 35 35 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 44.2 Write 16.6 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 34.3 24% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 32%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 220GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 82 86 82 88 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 110 Write 95.3 Mixed 83.6 SusWrite 85.1 69% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 65%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 355GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 75 78 79 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 91.3 Write 82.9 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 76.8 50% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 86%
WD WD3200JB-00KFA0 320GB 343 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 279GB free Firmware: 08.05J08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 35 35 35 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 63.1 Write 56.7 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 34.3 36% 48.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 35%
JetFlash TS4GJF168 4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 3GB free, PID 0163 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	8.09% Terrible	Read 30 Write 13.4 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 13.8 22% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 17% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.09% Great: 9%
Corsair Voyager GO 64GB 248 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 0GB free, PID 1a0f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 107 Write 59.6 Mixed 39.9 77% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.3 91% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14.4 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 54.7 73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	209x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	48x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	33x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	65x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16