Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 20:45
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1258
112% 946 Pts
64-Core 1740
108% 1740 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 229
Parallax 248
183% 234 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 225
Splatting 144
163% 208 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 274 308 313 306 305 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 479
Mixed 461
SusWrite 304
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 46.8
158% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 304
230% 311 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
253GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 371 456 479 464 466 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 480
Mixed 440
SusWrite 429
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 49.3
166% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 324
238% 316 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
468GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 371 455 479 464 480 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 479
Mixed 464
SusWrite 432
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 50
162% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 324
234% 305 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
134GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1355 297 298 295 300 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 2,464
Write 1464
Mixed 1,326
SusWrite 474
317% 1,432 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 66.8
227% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 446
367% 547 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 224%
Great: 280%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
714GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 1489 1455 1442 1486 1435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1455
Write 1403
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 1,463
304% 1,347 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 65.8
216% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 241
227% 365 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 234%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4A2666C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 27.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 28.3
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 56.4
71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback