Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2125 1,514 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 240 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 617 61% 498 Pts	64-Core 725 45% 725 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36BE) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27% Poor	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 35.1 Parallax 30.3 27% 33 fps	MRender 32.8 Gravity 32.9 Splatting 31 26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB 2,468 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 218 128 150 148 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 347 Write 346 Mixed 303 SusWrite 193 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 29.4 111% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 282 208% 271 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 94%
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GB 2,574 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 74GB free Firmware: M603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 396 393 297 292 290 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 419 Write 396 Mixed 355 SusWrite 342 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 37.3 127% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 250 213% 314 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 106%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 799GB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 100 106 105 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 52.5 Write 83 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 104 46% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD 3x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 3 of 8 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	62% Good	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 19.3 66% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 9.6 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	368x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	345x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	327x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	271x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	218x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	87x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16