Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 170% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 178% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190723
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '19 at 18:45
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 158 2-Core 316 103% 190 Pts	4-Core 626 8-Core 1,257 111% 941 Pts	64-Core 1,738 108% 1,738 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	163% Outstanding	Lighting 228 Reflection 230 Parallax 247 186% 235 fps	MRender 252 Gravity 225 Splatting 148 164% 208 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 280 303 293 290 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 427 Write 318 Mixed 295 SusWrite 294 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 29.5 103% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 215 176% 257 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 126%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 253GB free Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 380 461 432 430 440 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	90% Excellent	Read 459 Write 391 Mixed 404 SusWrite 416 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 29.1 110% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 314 225% 293 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 468GB free Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 379 460 432 430 449 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 461 Write 380 Mixed 396 SusWrite 418 93% 414 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 23.6 93% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 311 221% 288 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 134GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1173 389 299 288 285 298 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	176% Outstanding	Read 2,039 Write 1,398 Mixed 1,026 SusWrite 456 273% 1,230 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 38.9 132% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 960 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 361 319% 502 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 280%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 714GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1068 1027 1004 946 899 901 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1,365 Write 1,102 Mixed 827 SusWrite 974 239% 1,067 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 41.3 152% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 622 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 234 216% 346 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4A2666C16 4x16GB 533 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 27.6 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 37.9 SC Mixed 29.6 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 153%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 152%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	162x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	72x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	29x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	25x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	14x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 5,888 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	14x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,009

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16