Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 170% UFO	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 174% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190723
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '19 at 18:33
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 162 2-Core 323 105% 194 Pts	4-Core 643 8-Core 1,160 108% 901 Pts	64-Core 1,778 110% 1,778 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	160% Outstanding	Lighting 222 Reflection 220 Parallax 247 181% 229 fps	MRender 249 Gravity 221 Splatting 145 162% 205 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 287 304 284 289 284 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 467 Write 396 Mixed 400 SusWrite 297 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 27.3 111% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 311 224% 294 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 126%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 253GB free Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 385 450 402 419 419 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 404 Mixed 412 SusWrite 404 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 28.5 126% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 323 228% 294 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 468GB free Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 384 450 402 419 424 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 464 Write 394 Mixed 400 SusWrite 405 94% 416 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 25.7 110% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 324 233% 305 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 134GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1333 302 295 298 297 298 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,806 Write 1,361 Mixed 1044 SusWrite 470 260% 1,170 MB/s	4K Read 52.4 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 45.8 172% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 974 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 414 347% 527 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 280%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 714GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 960 1142 1341 1116 1180 1212 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,281 Write 1,098 Mixed 857 SusWrite 1,159 247% 1,099 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 39.2 161% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 624 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 243 221% 349 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4A2666C16 4x16GB 533 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 35.6 MC Mixed 28.1 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 38 SC Mixed 27.4 83% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 55.1 73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 153%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 152%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	162x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	72x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	29x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	25x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	14x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 5,888 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	14x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,009

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16