PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P65 (all builds) |
Memory | 28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180724 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 13 '19 at 14:52 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 1650) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.2%
Average
|
|||
Intel HD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 1650) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
|
3.15%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Liteon CV1-8B512 512GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G890109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 400 371 282 290 279 MB/s
|
86.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
40GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 399 317 322 301 325 MB/s
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 9905712-034.A00G 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
|
76.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples | 64x |
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 49x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 15% - Very poor | Total price: $140 |