Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 96 2-Core 170 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 784 63% 554 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	134% Outstanding	Lighting 179 Reflection 192 Parallax 208 146% 193 fps	MRender 202 Gravity 186 Splatting 130 137% 173 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1240 1492 1449 1659 1686 1410 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 1,892 Write 1,602 Mixed 1,364 SusWrite 1,489 356% 1,587 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 55.3 182% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 777 DQ Write 1,104 DQ Mixed 894 689% 925 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 435%
Micron_5210_MTFDDAK7T6QDE 7.5TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: D2MU801 SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 431 230 229 278 228 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB 5,545 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 26.1 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 25.6 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,021x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	443x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	273x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	272x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	156x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	762x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16