PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-880GM-D2H (all builds) |
Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120222 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 13 '19 at 12:36 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4100-$110
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
|
63.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 189 157 165 160 157 MB/s
|
66.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
108GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 105 103 103 MB/s
|
75.9%
Very good
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
61GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 61 60 54 42 MB/s
|
35.4%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 9.2 7.7 9.1 8.3 8.6 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
46.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 8x |
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 7x |
Athlon II X3 450AMD $80Bench 44%, 4,468 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples | 9x |
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples | 3x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $70 |