Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170124
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 11:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-4670K-$280
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
60.2% Good
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
74% 157 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 322
41% 307 Pts
64-Core 349
23% 349 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$480
Asus(1043 8548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 338
Reflection 293
Parallax 330
87% 320 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 299
Splatting 184
75% 227 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 280 300 296 295 297 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 387
Write 296
Mixed 240
SusWrite 293
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 24.3
99% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 244
196% 274 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 131%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$198
906GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 300 340 350 348 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 359
Write 349
Mixed 309
SusWrite 325
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 41.1
135% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 238
179% 240 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 125%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 197 195 195 196 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 199
Mixed 95
SusWrite 195
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.2
275% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 1315 BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 1315 BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 24GB
1867, 1867, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 12,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $854
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $206Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback