Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3540M-$120 6,652 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 61 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 45.4 31% 43.7 Pts	4-Core 62.4 8-Core 57 8% 59.7 Pts	64-Core 74 5% 74 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M6000 236 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Dell(1028 053F) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Lighting 12.9 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 17.9 10% 14.7 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 13.2 Splatting 15 11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB 31,107 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1210A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 311 345 340 117 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 322 Write 349 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 214 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 1% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 12.8 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.8 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	127x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	80x
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	72x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	18x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	11x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	10x

RAM
X7C75G-HYC 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 524 samples	17x
NT8GC64B8HB0NS-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 52%, 612 samples	15x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 4x4GBNanyaBench 52%, 422 samples	10x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16