Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 139%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181019
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 00:10
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9700K-$359
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
1-Core 150
2-Core 276
101% 213 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,082
103% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,110
74% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2552 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 393
Reflection 376
Parallax 408
103% 392 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 400
Splatting 260
107% 301 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$73
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 586 327 326 328 318 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2422
Write 1,475
Mixed 1,091
SusWrite 359
295% 1,337 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 76.2
258% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,457
DQ Mixed 1000
817% 1,144 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 253%
Great: 274%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
42GB free
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 95 87 85 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49% Average
Read 433
Write 88.5
Mixed 96
SusWrite 89.1
38% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 14.9
76% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 52.6
DQ Mixed 18.9
32% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49%
Great: 52%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$37
80GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 197 67 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 483
Write 353
Mixed 316
SusWrite 124
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 32.1
147% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 169
153% 230 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 90%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$22
238GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 82 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 72.8
Write 72.2
Mixed 56
SusWrite 82.2
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
842GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 196 196 196 195 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 83
Mixed 73
SusWrite 193
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
121GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 92 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 106
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 93.1
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 31.3
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 30.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 117%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 12,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 137%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,511
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $359Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback