Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 17:02
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 253
93% 161 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 815
85% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,042
70% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$269
Gigabyte(1458 3FBF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.4% Very good
Lighting 297
Reflection 237
Parallax 291
78% 275 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 263
Splatting 182
75% 223 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 80%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,875
Write 1309
Mixed 650
281% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 64.1
229% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,199
DQ Write 1152
DQ Mixed 862
733% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 232%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
5GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,725
Write 1,204
Mixed 544
254% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 48.8
220% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,243
DQ Write 1,162
DQ Mixed 804
713% 1,070 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 232%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$106
88GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 125 124 126 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 121
Write 110
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 124
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$135
4GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 83.6
Write 77.3
Mixed 79.3
60% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$104
538GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 107 118 116 118 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 82.1
Write 80.5
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 112
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 66%
Lacie P9233 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 168 167 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 111
Write 124
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 168
78% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.7
250% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 28
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 27.3
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $880
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback