Gigabyte GA-P65

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P65 (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180126
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '19 at 16:51
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 190 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 442 50% 390 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Gigabyte(1458 1650) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.9% Average	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 64.8 Parallax 52.8 45% 57.6 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 53.4 Splatting 63.7 50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 52%
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 1650) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	5.71% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 8.69 Parallax 6.59 5% 7.2 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 11.2 7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.71% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B512 512GB 2,348 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: G890109 SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 268 254 266 257 217 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 412 Mixed 326 SusWrite 264 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 40.7 139% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 46.7 97% 197 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 106%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65 6,111 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 40GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 384 320 323 280 320 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 395 Write 437 Mixed 358 SusWrite 340 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 38.1 136% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 322 242% 325 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GB 1,209 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.2% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 6.6 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P65 Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P65

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	114x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	64x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	49x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	17x
CV1-8B512 512GBLiteonBench 86%, 2,348 samples	13x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	10x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	26x
CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 1,209 samples	25x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GBG.SKILLBench 42%, 1,345 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $140

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16