Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171229
Uptime	13.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '19 at 15:56
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815 4,560 User benchmarks, average bench 83% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 235 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 853 73% 628 Pts	64-Core 2,176 135% 2,176 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.6% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 159 Parallax 136 84% 133 fps	MRender 78 Gravity 138 Splatting 107 88% 107 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 139 126 127 118 121 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 359 Write 183 Mixed 234 SusWrite 129 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 36.9 145% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 189 142% 192 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 87%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 176GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 435 401 407 408 377 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 459 Mixed 383 SusWrite 416 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 57.1 197% 73 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 356 257% 335 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 99GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,007 Write 1,814 Mixed 1,281 378% 1,700 MB/s	4K Read 50.4 4K Write 192 4K Mixed 79.4 280% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1204 DQ Write 1,065 DQ Mixed 1,120 844% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 890GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 92 91 91 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 96.7 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 90.9 62% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 57%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 112GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 94 82 99 145 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 134 Write 156 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 107 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 15.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 8.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	495x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	260x
Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	168x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $791

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16