Asus Commando

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus Commando  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081222
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 09:14
Run Duration5447 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 6600-$100
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 51.3
21% 42.8 Pts
4-Core 63.8
8-Core 67.8
9% 65.8 Pts
64-Core 63.5
4% 63.5 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 14%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 5870
XFX(1682 2961) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 80.2
20% 63.8 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 43.6
15% 44.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 17 28 31 32 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 57.5
Write 42.7
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 28
31% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 42%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
412GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 107 113 113 116 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 101
Write 111
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 111
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7 6.9 6.9 7 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.05% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 17.5
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 7
12% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 99%
Mobile Drive 320GB
0GB free, PID fc24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 29
Write 22.2
Mixed 15.7
27% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Seagate FreeAgent 500GB
205GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Read 19
Write 17.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 6.3
19% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 20%
Seagate Desktop 500GB
135GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.3 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 19.5
Write 17.7
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 6.3
19% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.1
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Commando Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Commando

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $500SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback