Asrock Z77 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.4% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 08:47
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-3570K-$195
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.8% Good
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 200
70% 150 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 389
53% 389 Pts
64-Core 386
26% 386 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 9.2
3% 11.1 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 7
Splatting 17.9
3% 12.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
9.4% Terrible
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 40.3
8% 32.2 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 31.8
11% 33.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.4%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$38
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 357
Write 337
Mixed 312
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 28.4
92% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 185
132% 169 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 119%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
657GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 123 135 132 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 127
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387,
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.4
9% 8.73 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 7%
WD Elements 2TB
283GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 27.1
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z77 Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,699 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4 - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $500SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback