Toshiba Satellite

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 23%
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 05:46
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
21.1% Poor
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 69.6
24% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 122
18% 129 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Toshiba(1179 FA26) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 9.7
2% 9.2 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 7.2
2% 6.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB2OC31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 27 24 21 27 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 31
Write 26.8
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 23.8
18% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Satellite Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 50%
Workstation 30%

System: Toshiba Satellite

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $219
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $618SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback