Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
5 days ago, 5 days ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory3.9 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 04:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H Vega Mobile Gfx
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.6% Good
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 164
60% 127 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 569
58% 456 Pts
64-Core 586
39% 586 Pts
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.16
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 150
Parallax 67.9
13% 87.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 44.9
12% 35.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 14%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 419 361 164 152 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 701
Write 579
Mixed 630
SusWrite 280
123% 548 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.3
185% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 699
532% 720 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 135%
Great: 172%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $215
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $630SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback