Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 03:05
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 248
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 958
86% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 86.8
57% 75.2 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 56.9
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,522
Write 2,223
Mixed 1,528
464% 2,091 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 76.9
255% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 870
626% 812 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
814GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 169 173 173 173 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 173
Mixed 107
SusWrite 172
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A3 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 137 136 136 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 125
Write 131
Mixed 102
SusWrite 136
169% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.9% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback