Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160408
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 00:15
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 223
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 675
68% 550 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1316 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.2% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 103
Parallax 94.8
82% 99.7 fps
MRender 87.9
Gravity 92.6
Splatting 80.6
71% 87 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,807
Write 1,300
Mixed 579
270% 1,228 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 63.3
236% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 43.2
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 59.1
51% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 331%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 187 192 194 185 184 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 176
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 187
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.6
264% 3 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 131%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
208GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 125 124 124 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 154
Write 142
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 124
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 84%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
416GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 183 185 184 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 171
Mixed 80
SusWrite 183
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
508GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 120 122 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 165
Write 156
Mixed 66
SusWrite 120
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
296% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 90 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 134
Write 114
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 89.6
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 101%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
762GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 68 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 90.3
Write 91.2
Mixed 81
SusWrite 68.7
62% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 45
127% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 21.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 114%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback