Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 21:59
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6850K-$543
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
86% 183 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 774
77% 611 Pts
64-Core 927
62% 927 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$528
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 414
Reflection 412
Parallax 431
108% 419 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 415
Splatting 264
102% 310 fps
Poor: 81%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$43
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 195 191 182 87 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 443
Mixed 352
SusWrite 175
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 48.1
163% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 243
191% 263 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
285GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 206 209 203 207 212 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 113
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 207
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 102%
Great: 116%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$173
697GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 128 130 136 129 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 182
Write 197
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 131
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
218% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90%
Great: 113%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$249
4TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 207 210 204 211 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 215
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 209
130% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
210% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 119%
Great: 122%
HP External HDD 1.5TB
246GB free, PID 4607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 35.9
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 36.2
46% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 21%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
170GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 37.9
Write 41.1
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 41.4
51% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3333 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2201 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 60.7
MC Mixed 47.4
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 23.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 131%
Great: 148%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 1,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,077
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i7-9700K $348Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $219
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $618SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback