Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 20:22
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 670
65% 535 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 138
Parallax 139
120% 142 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 128
Splatting 74.3
96% 124 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M7VC 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 120 128 125 136 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 427
Write 319
Mixed 181
SusWrite 135
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 41.4
134% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 109
127% 224 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 103%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
206GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2041 2002 1948 1846 1730 1582 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 2,411
Write 2,150
Mixed 1,386
SusWrite 1,858
438% 1,951 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 66.4
222% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 909
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 775
567% 748 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 312%
Great: 393%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
924GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 147 146 148 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 145
Mixed 103
SusWrite 147
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43TB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 30.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback