Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '19 at 19:43
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 72.2 1-Core 148 2-Core 297 91% 172 Pts	4-Core 559 8-Core 900 90% 730 Pts	64-Core 1,305 81% 1,305 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.5% Average	Lighting 56.1 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 55.4 46% 57.7 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 55.9 Splatting 50 45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1933 805 816 822 830 789 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	230% Outstanding	Read 1,886 Write 1,846 Mixed 1,427 SusWrite 999 345% 1,539 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 47.8 160% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,076 DQ Write 884 DQ Mixed 985 736% 982 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 355%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 3TB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 93 94 94 95 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 118 Write 120 Mixed 87.6 SusWrite 93.2 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 91%
Seagate GoFlex Cable 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 60GB free, PID 5170 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 293 280 265 307 378 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	191% Outstanding	Read 341 Write 200 Mixed 262 SusWrite 294 360% 274 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 15 1,380% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.9 DQ Write 22.9 DQ Mixed 16.8 1,409% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 191%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB 9,626 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.2% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 29.2 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 26.8 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 96.5 42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 132%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16