Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 19:11
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$276
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 260
93% 162 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 700
72% 569 Pts
64-Core 700
47% 700 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 72.8
13% 55.4 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 45.9
Splatting 43.1
12% 39.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 15%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$100
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 91 45 46 45 43 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 415
Write 114
Mixed 180
SusWrite 63
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.9
35% 8.47 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 274 274 273 273 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 295
Mixed 367
SusWrite 289
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 47.1
168% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 90.7
78% 110 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 115%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
229GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 274 273 274 273 273 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 485
Mixed 428
SusWrite 294
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 47.1
168% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 113
82% 101 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.4% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 24.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 25.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,142
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback