Asus G75VW

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus G75VW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G75VW
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121106
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '19 at 19:11
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 166 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 387 44% 346 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M 2,951 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 2119) 3GB CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	11% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 11.5 11% 13.3 fps	MRender 16.8 Gravity 13.4 Splatting 13 12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 555GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 377 365 317 306 313 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 438 Write 425 Mixed 334 SusWrite 345 87% 385 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 33.5 106% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 136 132% 209 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 126%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 45GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 82 82 83 84 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 78.8 Write 67.9 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 81.1 45% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.9 4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	7.92% Terrible	Read 36.4 Write 9.8 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 4.3 18% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 29% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.92% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3/4GX Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F KHX1600C9S3/4GX Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.6 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.3 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

CPU
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	346x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	248x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	342x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	274x
GeForce GTX 770NvidiaBench 9%, 2 samples	1x

SSD
LAT-256M3S 256GBLiteonitBench 75%, 575 samples	29x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 3,420 samples	66x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	60x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16